您现在的位置: 首页 > 微信群 > 微营销教学 > 国歌的由来|每周速览 | 营利性医疗机构不得擅用“协和”等字号;俄罗斯国歌著作权归美国公司?

微信扫一扫,添加关注

国歌的由来|每周速览 | 营利性医疗机构不得擅用“协和”等字号;俄罗斯国歌著作权归美国公司?

每周速览|营利性医疗机构不得擅用“协和”等字号;俄罗斯国歌著作权归美国公司?编译|布鲁斯本周知产要闻市场监管总局:营利性医疗机构不得擅自使用“协和”等知名医院字号网易云音乐“祝酷狗音乐猴年快乐”,称酷狗用无关专利“耍猴”霉霉新专辑《Ever

微信号: 720weixin

联系QQ: 720weixin

141

热度

其他信息

国歌的由来|每周速览 | 营利性医疗机构不得擅用“协和”等字号;俄罗斯国歌著作权归美国公司?
  • 0个评论

  • img

  • 720次点赞

  • 0个收藏

广告位 ID:2 320*120

国歌的由来|每周速览 | 营利性医疗机构不得擅用“协和”等字号;俄罗斯国歌著作权归美国公司?的详细说明:

每周速览 | 营利性医疗机构不得擅用“协和”等字号;俄罗斯国歌著作权归美国公司?


编译 | 布鲁斯



Е
{

本周知产要闻


  • 市场监管总局:营利性医疗机构不得擅自使用“协和”等知名医院字号

  • 网易云音乐“祝酷狗音乐猴年快乐”,称酷狗用无关专利“耍猴”

  • 霉霉新专辑《Evermore》被诉侵犯同名公园商标权,律师团队回应

  • 儿童汽车座椅生产商间现专利侵权纠纷

  • “红粮液”遭五粮液公司起诉商标侵权后因伪造证据遭罚款60万

  • 任正非就华为申请注册“姚安娜”等商标向全体员工致歉

  • 作家起诉动视暴雪:《使命召唤》角色抄袭?

  • Valve被判侵权游戏手柄专利,将赔偿Corsair 400万美元

  • 上海首设基层院知识产权检察办公室

  • Uber、Lyft、WhatsApp被诉侵犯GPS技术专利

  • 上传带国歌视频被告知侵权!俄罗斯国歌著作权归美国公司?

  • 2021年全球最具价值500大品牌榜



01


市场监管总局:营利性医疗机构

不得擅自使用“协和”等知名医院字号



近日,市场监管总局召开全系统电视电话会议并印发通知,要求全系统主动作为、落实责任,开展坚决清理整治知名医院被冒牌问题行动,逐一核查在名称中使用“协和”“华山”“同济”“华西”“湘雅”“齐鲁”“同仁”等知名医院字号的营利性医疗机构(含企业、个体工商户,下同),严厉惩处扰乱医疗市场秩序违法行为。
 
知名医院凭其医疗实力赢得了社会信誉和群众口碑,但有的医疗机构在没有合法授权的情况下,擅自使用“协和”等知名医院字号,欺诈、误导人民群众,在医疗活动中危害患者身体健康,严重侵害了正规医院的合法权益和公众形象,扰乱了正常医疗秩序。对此,社会反响强烈。
 
此次市场监管部门清理整治知名医院被冒牌问题,是本着对人民群众生命安全和身体健康负责的态度,进一步加大工作力度,彻查知名医院被冒牌问题,筑牢人民群众生命健康安全屏障。
 
市场监管总局要求,全面清理含有知名医院字号的市场主体。对未办理医疗机构许可证或者证照不一致的营利性医疗机构,一律责令变更名称;对营利性医疗机构以及医院管理、医疗美容、药品等相关行业企业,其名称在使用中对公众造成欺骗或者误解、损害他人合法权益的,一律依法予以纠正。知名医院之外的营利性医疗机构,无权利人直接授权的,一律不得在名称中使用“协和を”等知名医院字号。
∶ 
此次清理整治重在查处违法行为。严厉打击医疗领域不正当竞争行为和价格违法行为、严厉打击发布虚假违法医疗广告行为、严厉打击医疗机构商标侵权违法行为。重点查处企业名称违反《反不正当竞争法》有关规定,引人误认是知名医院的商品或者与知名医院存在特定联系;加大力度打击医疗机构擅自使用“协和”等知名医院名称标识,或利用违规名称发布虚假广告、欺骗及诱导患者、夸大病情或者疗效的行为;加大对知名医院商标权利的保护力度。
 
市场监管总局要求,强化对营利性医疗机构的信用监管,依法依规将营利性医疗机构等市场主体相关行政处罚、抽查检查结果等信息及时通过国家企业信用信息公示系统向社会公示,加强信用惩戒。同时,加强与卫生健康等部门协调沟通,建立知名医院品牌保护的长效机制。(来源:市说新语)
 

02

网易云音乐“祝酷狗音乐猴年快乐”,
☋称酷狗用无关专利“耍猴”
 
继 2 月 2 日上午网易云音乐通过官方微博喊话酷狗音乐,称后者抄袭其部分功能后,网易云音乐4日再次在微博上祝酷狗音乐“猴年快乐”,称针对近期很多用户和媒体朋友前来问询酷狗音乐专利文档一事,仔细查阅了其在官方微博里提到的五份专利文档,现在可以肯定地说:这是一场酷狗音乐用毫不相关、驴唇不对马嘴的专利文件,将公众和媒体当猴耍的闹剧。
 
网易云音乐此次提到,建议取消酷狗音乐相关团队年终奖励,因其“专利”一事与酷狗音乐毫不相关。并表示,即便夺来的笋已经堆满网易云音乐的每一个角落,鉴于酷狗音乐耍猴似的行为,还是要给予酷狗音乐以新春祝福。(来源:网易云音乐、差评)



03

霉霉新专辑《Evermore㈚》被诉侵犯
同名公园商标权,律师团队回应
 
据外媒2月4日消息,“霉霉”泰勒·斯威夫特(Taylor Swift)2020年末发布的第九张录音室专辑《Evermore》吸引了无数粉丝的追捧,但最近却招致一家主题公园起诉称其商标侵权。

《Evermore》专辑封面

据外媒报道,美国商人Ken Bretschneider正起诉霉霉,称对方发行销售专辑《Evermore》,侵犯自己在犹他州创办的同名公园的“Evermore”商标权。
 
Evermore公园方面声称,主题公园的创建构思始于2014年,以中世纪村庄、神话和传说为主题,2018年建成以来,已投入数百万美元用于设施建设、品牌化和运营。他们注册的“Evermore”商标涵盖了不同商业领域——包括服装和他们售卖的其他商品,而2020年末,霉霉的专辑《Evermore》发布之后,他们的销售额开始跳水。
 
Evermore公园表示,自从霉霉的新专辑发行之后,他们在谷歌上的搜索排名一直在下降,造成了“事实上的混淆”和利润受损。他们指出,霉霉的团队明明知道“Evermore”的商标已被注册,却仍使Evermore公园湮灭在铺天盖地的宣传营销中,这使得公园“对(Evermore公园)声誉失去掌控”。
 
Evermore公园方面正在寻求数额未定的赔偿,但提出“按每个销售、许诺销售或分发的商品或服务的每个假冒商标200万美元”的要求。
 
霉霉的法律团队称该桩诉讼“无聊而愚蠢”,并指出Evermore公园拖欠了数百万美元的建设费、机械费用、美化费用,所以索赔的真正意图很明显。而公园方表示,他们去年就发出信函要求对方中止侵权活动,直到现在才提出上百万美元的索赔。(知产力综合编译自ABC Audio、TWZ、新浪娱乐)
 

04
 
儿童汽车座椅生产商间现专利侵权纠纷
 

近日ɪa,瑞士儿童汽车座椅生产商Wonderland在美国特拉华地区联邦地区法院起诉其美国竞争对手Evenflo,称后者侵犯了涉及其产品的三件专利。地区法院法官理查德·安德鲁斯(Richard Andrews)于当地时间2月3日进行了远程审理。
Χ
 
这家瑞士公司于2018年12月提起诉讼,三件涉案美国专利为7,862,117、8,087,725和8,123,294号专利,涉及可调节的汽车座椅。
 
Wonderland表示,其涉案专利所保护的发明,可以让用户不用做复杂而繁琐的修改,而是以一个动作就能调节和配置儿童汽车座椅上的头枕和安全带;其还研发了一种➕将汽车座椅用作辅助座椅时的安全带和带扣存放系统并申请了专利。Wonder⑾land称Evenflo在2018年推出的EveryStage型号、EveryFit汽车安全座椅系列侵犯了其专利。
 
Π听审中,Evenflo辩称其产品不包含涉案专利的特征。Evenflo认为,Evenflo产品中的存放功能不侵犯Wonderland的专利,因为它是设计过程中的“事后思考”,并且“对市场营销并不重要也未做宣传”。目前该案正在进一步审理中。(知产力编译自WIPR)
 

⒓05
 
ㄲ“红粮液”遭五粮液公司起诉商标侵权
后因伪造证据遭罚款60万
 
2月3日,四川省成都市中级人民法院对外公布了2020成都法院十大典型案例,在这些案例中,一起由成都中院审理的五粮液与“红粮液”之间的商标权及不正当竞争纠纷引发热议。
 
案件审理过程中,“红粮液”公司法定代表人拿出了盖有“四川省绵阳市某工商部门广告管理专用章”的户外广告样稿,以及盖有“贵州省仁怀市某工商部门”印章的贴牌加工协议、备案通知证据,以此证明自己的商标备案记录,最终法院发现这些证据全是伪造的。
 
成都中院在审理四川省宜宾五粮液集团有限公司(下称“五粮液公司”)与四川省红粮液酒业有限公司(下称“红粮液公司”)、胡某某等侵害商标权及不正当竞争纠纷一案中,红粮液公司、胡某某为证明其早于五粮液公司使用与“五粮春”酒近似的商标、包装、装潢,向法院出具了盖有“四川省绵阳市某工商部门广告管理专用章”的户外广告样稿,以及盖有“贵州省仁怀市某工商部门”印章的贴牌加工协议、备案通知证据,以证明其于1998年、2004年在工商部门对上述证据进行了备案。
 
经法院核实,样稿及贴牌加工协议上印制的手机号码开通时间晚于上述证据的落款时间;贴牌加工协议并未备案,该协议上的签署意见、单位印章等均不是工商部门出具的。据法院多方调查,被告红粮液公司和相关个人,恶意伪造了这两份关键证据。
 
法院认为,红粮液公司、胡某某伪造本案的重要证据,妨碍人民法院审理案件,符合采取民事强制措施的条件,决定对红粮液公司及其法定代表人胡某某分别罚款50万元、10万元。
 
红粮液公司不服,向四川省高级人民法院申请复议,四川高院决定驳回复议申请,维持原决定。(来源:封面新闻)
 

06
 
任正非就华为申请注册“姚安娜”等商标
向全体员工致歉
 

据媒体2月3日报道,华为在内部心声社区发布《关于公司代理姚安娜商标注册的几点说明》。说明称,“社会上有些公司或个人恶意抢注姚安娜商标,我们不得为之”,“任总是第一次公权私用,为此向全体员工道歉”。
 
这份关于公司代理姚安娜商标注册的说明指出:
 
1、姚思为是任正非女儿,姚安娜是她的艺名。
 
2、社会上有些公司或个人恶意抢注姚安娜商标,我们不得为之。若自己不注册,商标会被持续的恶意抢注,有许多不利的地方。根据中国商标法的规定,中国大陆公民必须用公司名义或持有个体工商营业执照才可申请注册商标,姚安娜刚毕业,还没有注册自己的公司。因此,任总委托知识产权部代理注册,以后再转让给姚安娜的工作室,费用由她支付。
 
3、任总是第一次公权私用,为此向全体员工道歉。
 
1月14日,天浩盛世娱乐官方微博发文宣布,华为创始人任正非的小女儿姚安娜加入天浩盛世。姚安娜转发微博称,对于自己的一份特殊的生日礼物,未来同行,不负热爱。
 
继姚安娜出道后,有公开资料显示,华为技术有限公司新增多条“姚安娜”“姚思为”等商标信息,国际分类涉及教育娱乐、机械设备、科学仪器等,申请日期为2021年1月25日,目前商标状态显示为“商标申请中”。(来源:澎湃新闻)
 

07
 
作家起诉动视暴雪:
《使命召唤》角色抄袭?
 
近日,美国北卡罗来纳州的一位作家克莱顿·豪根(Clayton Haugen)称自己创作的角色被知名游戏公司动视暴雪(Activision Blizzard)在《使命召唤》中侵犯著作权,并以此为由对动视暴雪(Activision Blizzard)提起诉讼,一同被诉侵权的还有其旗下两家子公司Infinity Ward和北美电竞联赛巨头Majδor League Gaming Corp.。
 
诉讼由自称摄像师和作家的克莱顿·豪根(Clayton Haugen)于ㅢ2月2日在德克萨斯东区联邦地区法院提起,其声称自己创作了Cade Janus作为短片《十一月文艺复兴》的主角,他希望短片可以拍成电影,但“Cade Janus”角色被动视抄袭,用来创建《使命召唤》的operator “Mara”。
 
(来源:该案诉状,https://torrentfreak/images/2-21-cv-00035-Clayton-Haugen-v-Activision-Complaint-210202.pdf)
 
早在2017年,豪根聘请⒙播主亚历克斯·泽德拉(Alex Zedra)通过几张照片来展现人物角色,这些照片在社交媒体上共享并发送给电影制作公司,但据豪根声称动视将这些照片用作创作Mara的指南。豪根表示,他早在2012年、2013年就为其故事进行了著作权注册,但是相关照片则直到2020年12月才进行著作权注册,此后才得以提起诉讼。
 
豪根说,动视甚至还雇用了Zedra来扫描其肖像用于游戏。“为隐瞒其对豪根的Cade Janus摄影作品及角色的侵犯,被告还要求化妆师等签署保密协议。”2019年,Mara这一角色被添加到《使命召唤:现代战争》(Call of Duty: Modern Warfare)中,作为第一季战役通行证的一部分出现。
 
豪根希望“从被告的侵权行为中追回所有金钱赔偿,包括其因侵权行为所产生的全部利润”,并“在此行为所产生的费用中,在17 U.S.C.所允许的范围内全部收回,包括律师费”,并请求由陪审团审判。(来源:知产力编译自Eurogamer)
 

08
 
Valve被判侵权游戏手柄专利
将赔偿Corsair 400万美元
 

据外媒techpowerup消息,2月2日Valve在专利诉讼案中败诉,被判赔偿Corsair海盗船子公司Ironburg Inventions Ltd. 400万美元。这是由于Steam自家推出的Steam游戏手柄的后部按钮抄袭了该公司的设计。
 
这项专利在美国的编号为8641525号,于2011年提交。Ironburg的律师的Becker表示:“V社确实知道自己的行为存在侵权风险,但它还是这样做了。”但是V社的律师表示,Steam手柄特征与Ironburg的专利概要不符。在诉讼时他还表示将向八名陪审员分别邮寄Steam手柄,证明他所说的话是正确的。
 
Ironburg Inventions公司于2019年被海盗船收购,因此专利所有权也一同归海盗船所有。早在2014年,Valve便被该公司警告,其游戏手柄按钮设计侵犯了该公司的设计专利。截至目前,Steam游戏手柄已经销售了大约160万台。(来源:IT之家)
 

09
 
上海首设基层院知识产权检察办公室
 
2月国歌的由来2日,上海市静安区检察院知识产权检察办公室揭牌。据悉,这是上海首家在基层检察院挂牌成立的知识产权检察办公室。该办公室整合知识产权刑事、民事、行政检察职能,专门从事知识产权检察工作。
 
办公室主要有三项职能,一是发挥四大检察职能,实现“四位一体”综合性司法保护。全面落实知识产权专业化办案机制,充分发挥检察一体化办案优势,加大侵犯知识产权犯罪打击力度。其次,落实“两法衔接”机制,推进行刑衔接。与相关行政执法机关加强协作,推动信息互享互通,从行政处罚案件┽中发现刑事犯罪线索。再次,参与社会综合治理,发挥延伸职能。通过制发检察建议、发布白皮书等方式,加强知识产权法律风险防控,促进知识产权领域行业规范,实现“办理一案,治理一片”的目标。(知产力编辑自正义网、法治日报——法制网)
 

10
 
Uber、Lyft、WhatsApp被诉
侵犯GPS技术专利
 

据Law360当地时间2月1日报道,两款打车应用Uber、Lyft,以及Facebook旗下的即时通信应用WhatsApp在美国德克萨斯东区联邦地区法院面临诉讼,原因是这几家公司所声称基于GPS的技术被AGIS Software Development LLC认为侵犯了其专利。
 
作为前美国海军陆战队的紧急通讯承包商, AGIS在1月29日对网约车巨头Uber Technologies Inc.和Lyft Inc.,以及Facebook旗下的WhatsApp Inc.提起三件诉讼,称几家公司侵犯了7,031,728、7,630,724、8,213,970、10,299,100、10,341,838号等五件相关的美国专利。这些专利是有关一种被称为“LifeRing”的通信系统的,该系统由AGIS销售给急救人员、执法人员和军事人员使用。
 
AGIS表示,Uber和Lyft允许用户组团以发起乘车请求并显示地图信息,侵犯了其专利;WhatsApp的用户间语音呼叫和组团进行位置共享的功能,侵犯了其专利。AGIS请求法院判令被告侵权全部五件专利,并给予一定赔偿。索赔具体数额未披露。(知产力编译自Law360)
 
щ
ㅝ11
 
χ上传带国歌视频被告知侵权!
俄罗斯国歌著作权归美国公司?
 

综合俄罗斯媒体报道,美国最大视频分享平台YouTube的一些用户最近遇到了这样一种情况,在上传带有俄罗斯国歌的视频内容时,会收到平台发出的一个警告,称视频侵犯了美国著作权人的著作权。YouTube声称,俄罗斯国歌的著作权人是一家美国公司,名叫Broadcast Music Inc.。
 
一名俄罗斯博客作者尤里·霍万斯基在社交媒体Telegram上发文称,他在YouTube上发布了一个配有俄罗斯国歌的视频,但收到了平台方发出的警告:该视频似乎包含“有争议的内容”,如果在视频中使用国歌,则可能会面临著作权问题。
 
报道称,出现这样的问题肯定不是因为俄罗斯法律。按照俄罗斯法律,国歌的歌词和旋律的著作权归公共所有,因为那是俄罗斯的国家象征。
 
事实证明,苏联作曲家亚历山大·亚历山德罗夫创作的俄罗斯国歌所用旋律,在某种程度上被美国BMI公司“私有化”了。博客作者指出,现在要在YouTube上传带有俄罗斯国歌的视频,必须向“著作权人”提交申请。这真的太魔幻了。
 
针对这一情况,俄罗斯通信、信息技术和媒体监督局(Roskomnadzor)已经发表声明,称Youtube阻止俄罗斯国歌,是对俄罗斯人民的公开且令人不可接受的羞辱,敦促谷歌公司取消据称禁止在YouTube上发布包含俄罗斯国歌❦的视频的限制。谷歌公司发言人随后表示,BMI公司的投诉已经过复核,并被YouTube平台认为是没有根据的。
彡 
但是,当“俄罗斯-24”电视台尝试上传一段带有俄罗斯电视台新年前夜播放的国歌版本的视频时,其记者也收到了侵权投诉。有两家美国公司投诉该视频侵犯著作权,但都不是BMI公司。
 
YouTube上有关俄罗斯国歌著作权的问题并不是第一次出现。早在2015年,YouTube称俄罗斯国歌属于美国音乐出版社Harry Fox Agency,几个月后,另一家外国公司成为俄罗斯国歌的著作权人,2018年,俄罗斯国歌的著作权被“赋予”美国公司UMPG Publishing。2020年夏天,YouTube宣布俄罗斯国歌的著作权人是TuneCore Publishing。
 
俄媒指出,YouTube实际上是在试图让数字掠夺甚至盗版合法化,同时还对这类行为予以鼓励。这表明美国数字巨头认为自己不仅有权处置其用户账户,而且还有权力支配与其无任何关系的文化历史遗产。(来源:环球网)
 

e12
 
デ2021年全球最具价值500大品牌榜
 

近日,英国知名品牌价值咨询公司“品牌金融”(Brand Finance)发布“2021全球最具价值500大品牌榜”(Global500 2021),苹果以2633.75亿美元的品牌价值升至第一位,比上年增长了87.4%。亚马逊、谷歌和微软也进入了前四名。中国的工商银行和微信进入了前十名;华为跌出前十,名列第15位。
 
全球500大品牌总价值71526亿美元。其中,47个科技品牌价值9989亿美元,45个零售品牌价值9349亿美元,67个银行品牌尢价值8815亿美元,27个媒体品牌价值6542亿美元,25个汽车品牌价值5222亿美元,34个电信品牌价值5087亿美元,33个保险品牌价值3165亿美元,20个石油天然气品牌价值2942亿美元,26个工程建筑品牌价值2459亿美元,15个商业服务品牌价值2032亿美元,19个服装和饰品品牌价值1991亿美元。
 
按品牌所属国家看,197个美国品牌价值32807亿美元,77个中国大陆品牌价值14223亿美元,34个日本品牌价值4599亿美元,22个德国品牌价值4184亿美元,32个法国品牌价值2882亿美元,10个韩国品牌价值1960亿美元,19个英国品牌价值1747亿美元,15个加拿大品牌价值1140亿美元,12个印度品牌价值894亿美元,7个荷兰品牌价值892亿美元,11个瑞士品牌价值827亿美元。(来源:全球企业动态)



图片来源 | 网络






往期热文

ю

国歌的由来
Ÿ





Weekly Quick Fact | For-profit medical institutions are not allowed to use the name Concord without authorization; the copyright of the Russian national anthem belongs to the US company Compilation | Bruce this week, the General Administration of Market Supervision of Intellectual Property News: For-profit medical institutions shall not use Concord and other well-known hospitals without authorization. NetEase Cloud Music Wish Kugou Music a Happy Year of the Monkey, claiming that Kugou uses an unrelated patent Playing Monkey The album Evermore was sued for infringing on the trademark rights of the park of the same name. The team of lawyers responded to the current patent infringement dispute between the child car seat manufacturers. Hongliangye was sued by Wuliangye for trademark infringement and was fined 600,000 for forging evidence. Ren Zhengfei applied for the registration of Huawei Yao Anna and other trademarks apologize to all employees, the writer sues Activision Blizzard: Call of Duty role plagiarism Valve was convicted of infringing game controller patents and will compensate Corsair 4 million U.S. dollars. Shanghais first grassroots court intellectual property prosecution office Uber, Lyft, and WhatsApp were sued for infringing GPS technology patents and uploaded videos with national anthems. The copyright of the Russian national anthem belongs to the American company 2021 World’s 500 Most Valuable Brands List 01 General Administration of Market Supervision: For-profit medical institutions must not use well-known hospital names such as Xiehe without authorization. Recently, the General Administration of Market Supervision held a system-wide video and telephone conference and issued a notice, requiring the whole system to take the initiative, Implement responsibilities, carry out actions to resolutely clean up and rectify the counterfeit problems of well-known hospitals, and check one by one for-profit medical services that use well-known hospital names such as Xiehe, Huashan, Tongji, Huaxi, Xiangya, Qilu and Tongren in their names Institutions (including enterprises and individual industrial and commercial households, the same below), severely punish violations of the order of the medical market. u0026nbsp;Well-known hospitals have won social credibility and public praise due to their medical strength, but some medical institutions used well-known hospital names such as Xiehe without legal authorization to deceive and mislead the people and harm the people in medical activities The patients health seriously violated the legitimate rights and public image of regular hospitals, and disrupted the normal medical order. In response, the society has responded strongly. u0026nbsp;The market supervision department cleans up and rectifies the counterfeit problem of well-known hospitals, in an attitude of being responsible for the life safety and health of the people, further intensify its work, thoroughly investigate the counterfeit problem of well-known hospitals, and strengthen the lives and health of the people Security barrier. u0026nbsp;The General Administration of Market Supervision requires that the market entities with well-known hospital names should be thoroughly cleaned up. All for-profit medical institutions that have not applied for medical institution licenses or inconsistent licenses and licenses shall be ordered to change their names; for for-profit medical institutions and enterprises in related industries such as hospital management, medical cosmetology, and drugs, their names may deceive or misunderstand the public in use 1. Anyone who damages the lawful rights and interests of others shall be corrected according to law. For-profit medical institutions other than well-known hospitals, without the direct authorization of the right holder, shall not use well-known hospitals such as Xiehe in their names. u0026nbsp;The focus of this clean-up and rectification is to investigate and punish illegal acts. Severely crack down on unfair competition and price violations in the medical field, severely crack down on the publication of false and illegal medical advertisements, and severely crack down on trademark infringement and illegal activities of medical institutions. Focus on investigating and punishing the name of the company that violates the relevant provisions of the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, misleading people to believe that it is a product of a well-known hospital or has a specific connection with a well-known hospital; intensify efforts to combat the unauthorized use of well-known hospital name signs such as Xiehe by medical institutions, or Use illegal names to publish false advertisements, deceive and induce patients, exaggerate the condition or curative effect; strengthen the protection of the trademark rights of well-known hospitals. u0026nbsp;The General Administration of Market Supervision requires that the credit supervision of for-profit medical institutions be strengthened, and relevant administrative penalties, spot checks and inspection results of for-profit medical institutions and other market entities shall be promptly disclosed to the society through the national enterprise credit information disclosure system in accordance with laws and regulations, and strengthen Credit punishment. At the same time, strengthen coordination and communication with health departments and establish a long-term mechanism for brand protection of well-known hospitals. (Source: Shishuoxinyu)u0026nbsp;02 Netease Cloud Music Wish Kugou Music a Happy Year of the Monkey, claiming that Kugou uses an unrelated patent Playing Monkeyu0026nbsp;Following the morning of February 2 Netease Cloud Music announced cool through its official Weibo Dog Music claimed that after the latter had copied some of its functions, NetEase Cloud Music once again wished Kugou Music Happy Year of the Monkey on Weibo on the 4th, saying that many users and media friends recently came to inquire about Kugou Musics patent documents. , After carefully reviewing the five patent documents mentioned in its official Weibo, it is now safe to say: This is a patent document that is irrelevant to Kugou music and that the donkey’s lips are not right. The monkeys farce. u0026nbsp;Netease Cloud Music mentioned this time that it is recommended to cancel the year-end rewards for Kugou Music-related teams, because its patent has nothing to do with Kugou Music. He also said that even if the captured bamboo shoots have been piled up in every corner of NetEase Cloud Music, in view of Kugou Musics monkey-like behavior, it is still necessary to give Kugou Music a New Year blessing. (Source: NetEase Cloud Music, bad review) 03 Mycos new album Evermore was sued for infringing on the trademark rights of the park of the same name. The lawyer team responded. According to foreign media news on February 4, Myco Taylor Swift ( Taylor Swift) The ninth studio album Evermore released at the end of 2020 has attracted countless fans, but recently it has caused a theme park to sued for trademark infringement. Evermore album cover According to foreign media reports, American businessman Ken Bretschneider is suing Momo, claiming that the other party released and sold the album Evermore, infringing on the Evermore trademark rights of the park of the same name he founded in Utah. u0026nbsp;Evermore Park claims that the concept of the theme park started in 2014, with the theme of medieval villages, myths and legends. Since its completion in 2018, it has invested millions of dollars in facility construction, branding and operation. Their registered Evermore trademark covers different business areas-including clothing and other products they sell. At the end of 2020, after the release of the album Evermore, their sales began to dive. u0026nbsp;Evermore Park stated that since the release of Mycos new album, their search rankings on Google have been declining, causing de facto confusion and damage to profits. They pointed out that the team knew that the Evermore trademark had been registered, but the Evermore Park was still annihilated in the overwhelming publicity and marketing, which made the park lost control over the reputation of (Evermore Park). u0026nbsp;Evermore Park is seeking an undetermined amount of compensation, but it is requesting US$2 million per counterfeit trademark for each commodity or service sold, promised to sell, or distributed. u0026nbsp;Mycos legal team called the lawsuit boring and stupid and pointed out that Evermore Park owed millions of dollars in construction, machinery, and landscaping costs, so the true intention of the claim was obvious. The park said that they sent a letter last year asking the other party to suspend the infringing activities, and only now have they filed a claim of millions of dollars. (Comprehensively compiled from ABC Audio, TWZ, and Sina Entertainment)u0026nbsp;04u0026nbsp;Patent infringement disputes between child car seat manufacturersu0026nbsp;Recently, Swiss child car seat manufacturer Wonderland is in the Federal District of Delaware The court sued its US rival Evenflo, claiming that the latter infringed three patents related to its products. District Court Judge Richard Andrews (Richard Andrews) conducted a remote trial on February 3, local time. u0026nbsp;The Swiss company filed a lawsuit in December 2018. The three US patents involved are 7,862,117, 8,087,725 and 8,123,294, which involve adjustable car seats. u0026nbsp;Wonderland said that the invention protected by its patent involved allows users to adjust and configure the headrest and safety belt on the child car seat with one action without making complicated and tedious modifications; it has also developed A safety belt and buckle storage system when the car seat is used as an auxiliary seat has been patented. Wonderland claims that the EveryStage model and EveryFit car seat series launched by Evenflo in 2018 violated its patents. u0026nbsp;During the hearing, Evenflo argued that its products did not contain the features of the patent in question. Evenflo believes that the storage function in Evenflo products does not infringe Wonderlands patents, because it is an afterthought in the design process and is not important to marketing and has not been publicized. The case is currently under further trial. (Intellectual Property Compiled from WIPR)u0026nbsp;05u0026nbsp;Hongliangye was fined 600,000 for forging evidence after being sued by Wuliangye Company for trademark infringementu0026nbsp;On February 3, the Chengdu Intermediate Peoples Court of Sichuan Province announced the 2020 Chengdu Ten typical court cases. In these cases, a trademark right and unfair competition dispute between Wuliangye and Hongliangye that was heard by the Chengdu Intermediate Peoples Court triggered heated discussions. u0026nbsp;During the trial of the case, the legal representative of the Hongliangye company took out a sample outdoor advertisement stamped with the special seal for the advertising management of a certain industrial and commercial department in Mianyang City, Sichuan Province, as well as a certain industrial and commercial department in Renhuai City, Guizhou Province. The “department’s” seal of the OEM processing agreement and filing notice evidence to prove their trademark filing records. In the end, the court found that these evidences were all forged. u0026nbsp;Chengdu Intermediate Peoples Court is hearing the trademark infringement by Sichuan Yibin Wuliangye Group Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Wuliangye Company), Sichuan Province Hongliangye Liquor Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Hongliangye Company), Hu Moumou, etc. In the case of disputes over unfair competition, Hongliangye Company and Hu Moumou, in order to prove that they used trademarks, packaging, and decorations similar to Wuliangchun liquor, before Wuliangye Company, issued a statement with the name Mianyang, Sichuan Province to the court. The outdoor advertisement sample draft of the special seal for the advertising management of a certain industrial and commercial department in the city, as well as the OEM processing agreement with the seal of a certain industrial and commercial department in Renhuai City, Guizhou Province, and the record notice evidence to prove that it was in the industrial and commercial department in 1998 and 2004 The above evidence was filed. u0026nbsp;According to the court’s verification, the activation time of the mobile phone number printed on the sample and OEM processing agreement was later than the signing time of the above evidence; the OEM processing agreement has not been filed, and the signed opinions and unit seals on the agreement are not industrial and commercial departments Issued. According to various court investigations, the defendant Hongliangye Company and related individuals maliciously forged these two key pieces of evidence. u0026nbsp;The court held that Hongliangye Company and Hu XX had forged important evidence in this case, hindered the people’s court from hearing the case, and met the conditions for adopting civil compulsory measures, and decided to fine Hongliangye Company and its legal representative Hu XX each by 50 Ten thousand yuan, 100,000 yuan. u0026nbsp;Hongliangye Company refused to accept it and applied to the Sichuan Higher Peoples Court for reconsideration. The Sichuan Higher Court decided to reject the application for reconsideration and maintain the original decision. (Source: Cover News)u0026nbsp;06u0026nbsp;Ren Zhengfei apologizes to all employees for Huawei’s application for the registration of Yao Anna and other trademarksu0026nbsp;According to a media report on February 3, Huawei released the Regarding the company’s agency for the trademark registration of Yao Anna A few notes. The explanation stated that some companies or individuals in society maliciously register Yao Annas trademark, and we must not do this and Ren is always the first private use of public power. I apologize to all employees for this. u0026nbsp;This note on the trademark registration of the company’s agent Yao Anna pointed out:u0026nbsp;1, Yao Siwei is the daughter of Ren Zhengfei, and Yao Anna is her stage name. u0026nbsp;2. Some companies or individuals maliciously register Yao Annas trademark in the society, and we must not do it. If you do not register yourself, the trademark will be continuously registered maliciously, which has many disadvantages. According to the Chinese Trademark Law, mainland Chinese citizens must use the name of a company or hold an individual business license to apply for trademark registration. Anna Yao has just graduated and has not registered her own company. Therefore, Mr. Ren commissioned the Intellectual Property Department to register as an agent, and later transferred to Yao Annas studio at the expense of her. u0026nbsp;3. Ren is always the first private use of public power, and I apologize to all employees for this. u0026nbsp;On January 14, the official Weibo of Tianhao Shengshi Entertainment announced that Yao Anna, the youngest daughter of Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei, joined Tianhao Shengshi. Anna Yao reposted on Weibo that she would live up to her love for her special birthday gift. u0026nbsp;Following Yao Anna’s debut, public information showed that Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. added a number of trademark information such as Yao Anna and Yao Siwei. The international classification covers education and entertainment, mechanical equipment, scientific instruments, etc. The application date is On January 25, 2021, the current trademark status was displayed as Trademark Application. (Source: The Paper)u0026nbsp;07u0026nbsp;The writer sues Activision Blizzard: Call of Duty character plagiarism u0026nbsp;Recently, a writer from North Carolina, Clayton Haugen, claimed that his character was infringed by the well-known game company Activision Blizzard in Call of Duty. In order to file a lawsuit against Activision Blizzard, two of its subsidiaries Infinity Ward and North American gaming league giant Major League Gaming Corp. were also accused of infringement. u0026nbsp;The lawsuit was filed in the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Texas on February 2 by Clayton Haugen, who claims to have created Cade Janus as a short film November Art The protagonist of Renaissance, he hopes that the short film can be made into a movie, but the Cade Janus character passively sees plagiarism and is used to create the operator Mara of Call of Duty. u0026nbsp;(Source: The complaint of the case, https://torrentfreak/images/2-21-cv-00035-Clayton-Haugen-v-Activision-Complaint-210202.pdf)u0026nbsp;As early as 2017, Hogen hired a broadcaster The main character, Alex Zedra, used a few photos to show the characters. These photos were shared on social media and sent to the film production company, but according to Hogan, Activision used these photos for the creation of Mara. Guide. Hoogen stated that he had registered the copyright for his stories as early as 2012 and 2013, but the related photos were not registered for copyright until December 2020, after which he was able to file a lawsuit. u0026nbsp;Hogan said that Activision even hired Zedra to scan his portraits for gaming. In order to conceal his infringement on Hoogens Cade Janus photographs and characters, the defendant also required makeup artists to sign a confidentiality agreement. In 2019, the character Mara was added to Call of Duty: Modern Warfare (Call of Duty: Modern Warfare), appeared as part of the first season campaign pass. u0026nbsp;Haugen hopes to recover all monetary damages from the defendant’s infringement, including all profits arising from the infringement, and of the costs incurred in this act, all within the scope permitted by 17 USC Recover, including attorneys fees, and request a jury trial. (Source: Intellectual Property, compiled from Eurogamer)u0026nbsp;08u0026nbsp;Valve was convicted of infringing game controller patents and will compensate Corsair US$4 millionu0026nbsp;According to foreign media techpowerup, Valve lost the patent lawsuit on February 2 and was awarded compensation. Corsairs subsidiary Ironburg Inventions Ltd. US$4 million. This is because the rear buttons of the Steam gamepad launched by Steam copied the companys design. u0026nbsp;This patent is numbered 8641525 in the United States and was filed in 2011. Ironburgs attorneys Becker said: V agency does know that its actions are at risk of infringement, but it did so. However, the V agencys lawyer said that the features of the Steam handle do not match Ironburgs patent outline. During the lawsuit, he also stated that he would mail Steam handles to the eight jurors separately to prove that what he said was correct. u0026nbsp;Ironburg Inventions was acquired by Corsair in 2019, so the patent ownership also belongs to Corsair. As early as 2014, Valve was warned by the company that its gamepad button design violated the companys design patent. Up to now, Steam gamepads have sold approximately 1.6 million units. (Source: IT House)u0026nbsp;09u0026nbsp;Shanghais first grassroots courts intellectual property prosecution officeu0026nbsp;In February, the origin of the national anthem, the Intellectual Property Procuratorate Office of the Jing’an District Procuratorate of Shanghai was unveiled. It is reported that this is the first intellectual property prosecution office established in Shanghai at the basic level procuratorate. The office integrates intellectual property criminal, civil, and administrative procuratorial functions, and specializes in intellectual property procuratorial work. u0026nbsp;The office has three main functions. The first is to give play to the four major procuratorial functions to realize the four in one comprehensive judicial protection. Fully implement the specialized case handling mechanism for intellectual property rights, give full play to the advantages of integrated prosecution handling cases, and increase the crackdown on crimes that infringe on intellectual property rights. Second, implement the two-law convergence mechanism and promote criminal convergence. Strengthen cooperation with relevant administrative law enforcement agencies, promote information sharing and exchange, and discover clues to criminal offences in administrative punishment cases. Third, participate in comprehensive social governance and play an extended function. We will strengthen the prevention and control of intellectual property legal risks, promote industry norms in the field of intellectual property rights, and achieve the goal of one case is handled, one case is handled through methods such as issuing procuratorial recommendations and publishing white papers. (Edited by Zhichanli from Justice Network, Rule of Law Daily-Legal Network)u0026nbsp;10u0026nbsp;Uber, Lyft, and WhatsApp were sued for infringing GPS technology patentsu0026nbsp;According to Law360 local time on February 1, two taxi-hailing apps Uber and Lyft , And Facebook’s instant messaging application WhatsApp is facing a lawsuit in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas because the GPS-based technology claimed by these companies is deemed infringing on its patents by AGIS Software Development LLC. u0026nbsp;As the former U.S. Marine Corps emergency communications contractor, AGIS filed three lawsuits against ride-hailing giants Uber Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc., as well as Facebook’s WhatsApp Inc. on January 29, alleging several companies Infringed five related U.S. patents, 7,031,728, 7,630,724, 8,213,970, 10,299,100, 10,341,838. These patents are related to a communication system called LifeRing, which is sold by AGIS to emergency personnel, law enforcement personnel and military personnel. u0026nbsp;AGIS stated that Uber and Lyft infringed their patents by allowing users to form groups to initiate ride requests and display map information; WhatsApp’s functions for voice calls between users and location sharing in groups violated their patents. AGIS requested the court to order the defendant to infringe all five patents and to pay certain compensation. The exact amount of the claim was not disclosed. (Zhichanli compiled from Law360)u0026nbsp;11u0026nbsp;Uploaded a video with the national anthem and was notified of infringement! The copyright of the Russian national anthem belongs to the American company u0026nbsp;Comprehensive Russian media reports, some users of YouTube, the largest video-sharing platform in the United States, recently encountered such a situation. When uploading video content with the Russian national anthem, they received a warning from the platform that the video infringed US copyright. People’s copyright. YouTube claims that the copyright owner of the Russian national anthem is an American company called Broadcast Music Inc. u0026nbsp;A Russian blogger, Yuri Khovansky, posted on the social media Telegram that he posted a video with the Russian national anthem on YouTube, but received a warning from the platform: the video seems to contain Controversial content, if you use the national anthem in your video, you may face copyright issues. u0026nbsp;Reports say that such problems are certainly not because of Russian law. According to Russian law, the copyright of the lyrics and melody of the national anthem belongs to the public, because it is a national symbol of Russia. u0026nbsp;Facts have proved that the melody used in the Russian national anthem composed by Soviet composer Alexander Alexandrov has been privatized by the American BMI company to some extent. The blogger pointed out that now to upload a video with the Russian national anthem on YouTube, an application must be submitted to the copyright holder. This is really magical. u0026nbsp;In response to this situation, the Russian Communications, Information Technology and Media Supervision Agency (Roskomnadzor) has issued a statement saying that YouTube’s blocking of the Russian national anthem is an open and unacceptable humiliation to the Russian people and urges Google to cancel the alleged prohibition Restrictions on posting videos containing the Russian national anthem on YouTube. A Google spokesperson subsequently stated that BMI’s complaint had been reviewed and deemed unfounded by the YouTube platform. u0026nbsp;However, when the Russia-24 TV station tried to upload a video with a version of the national anthem broadcast by the Russian TV station on New Years Eve, its reporter also received a complaint of infringement. Two American companies complained that the video infringed copyright, but none of them were BMI companies. u0026nbsp;This is not the first time that YouTube issues regarding the copyright of the Russian national anthem have appeared. As early as 2015, YouTube claimed that the Russian national anthem belonged to the American music publishing house Harry Fox Agency. A few months later, another foreign company became the copyright owner of the Russian national anthem. In 2018, the copyright of the Russian national anthem was given to the American company UMPG Publishing. In the summer of 2020, YouTube announced that the copyright owner of the Russian national anthem is TuneCore Publishing. u0026nbsp;Russian media pointed out that YouTube is actually trying to legalize digital plunder and even piracy, and it also encourages such behavior. This shows that American digital giants believe that they not only have the right to dispose of their user accounts, but also have the right to control cultural and historical heritage that has nothing to do with them. (Source: World Wide Web)u0026nbsp;12u0026nbsp;The 2021 Global 500 Most Valuable Brandsu0026nbsp;Recently, the well-known British brand value consulting company Brand Finance (Brand Finance) released the 2021 Global Most Valuable 500 Brands (Global500 2021), Apple rose to the first place with a brand value of $263.375 billion, an increase of 87.4% over the previous year. Amazon, Google and Microsoft also entered the top four. China’s Industrial and Commercial Bank of China and WeChat entered the top ten; Huawei fell out of the top ten and ranked 15th. u0026nbsp;The world’s top 500 brands are valued at US$7152.6 billion. Among them, 47 technology brands are worth US$998.9 billion, 45 retail brands are worth US$934.9 billion, 67 banking brands are worth US$881.5 billion, 27 media brands are worth US$654.2 billion, 25 car brands are worth US$522.2 billion, and 34 are telecom brands. Brand value is US$508.7 billion, 33 insurance brands are valued at US$316.5 billion, 20 oil and gas brands are valued at US$294.2 billion, 26 engineering construction brands are valued at US$245.9 billion, 15 commercial service brands are valued at US$203.2 billion, and 19 apparel and accessories The brand value is 199.1 billion US dollars. u0026nbsp;According to the country where the brands belong, 197 American brands are valued at US$3.2807 billion, 77 Chinese brands are valued at US$1422.3 billion, 34 Japanese brands are valued at US$459.9 billion, 22 German brands are valued at US$418.4 billion, and 32 French brands are worth US$418.4 billion. 288.2 billion U.S. dollars, 10 Korean brands worth 196 billion U.S. dollars, 19 British brands worth 174.7 billion U.S. dollars, 15 Canadian brands worth 114 billion U.S. dollars, 12 Indian brands worth 89.4 billion U.S. dollars, 7 Dutch brands worth 89.2 billion U.S. dollars, 11 A Swiss brand is worth US$82.7 billion. (Source: Global Corporate News) Image source | The origin of the national anthem of the past popular online articles
广告位 ID:2 320*120

排行榜

其他文章

登录

使用微信帐号直接登录,无需注册